Title
In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Political Behavior
Publication Date
6-1-2011
Abstract
This study uses an experimental design to simulate the ballot counting process during a hand-recount after a disputed election. Applying psychological theories of motivated reasoning to the political process, we find that ballot counters' party identification conditionally influences their ballot counting decisions. Party identification's effect on motivated reasoning is greater when ballot counters are given ambiguous, versus specific, instructions for determining voter intent. This study's findings have major implications for ballot counting procedures throughout the United States and for the use of motivated reasoning in the political science literature. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Volume
33
Issue
2
First Page
271
Last Page
290
DOI
10.1007/s11109-010-9133-x
ISSN
01909320
Recommended Citation
Kopko, Kyle C.; Bryner, Sarah Mc Kinnon; Budziak, Jeffrey; Devine, Christopher J.; and Nawara, Steven P., "In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections" (2011). Faculty Publications. 1280.
https://jayscholar.etown.edu/facpubharvest/1280